Policy management: definition

The directive style is one of the 4 existing management styles, the others being participatory management, persuasive management and delegated management. Policy management is the most commonly used corporate style in the world. You are told what exactly this consists of, as well as its limitations.

Article plan

Related topic : Civil society means (SCM)

  • What is policy management based on?
    • A one-way perception
  • Directive management, a common style
    • What is a good executive manager?
  • Advantages of executive management
  • The disadvantages of executive management Work
  • and management: which style to choose?
    • Why and when to avoid directive management

What is policy management based on?

The characteristics of policy management are quite known. The manager is very involved in his company and with employees. He makes decisions based on his own feelings, giving only little autonomy to employees.

The directive management style is quite enterprising and structured. The goal is to achieve results fairly quickly and efficiently. A directive management gives almost no room for the autonomy of its team of employees: the manager controls and decides everything, in short. If he does not delegate, the executive manager must 100% ensure his decisions and be effective. It’s a bet to take.

Read also : Inter or intra-company training: making the difference

A one-way perception

The manager/leader does not hesitate to impose his perception of things and his decisions, for what he considers to be the common good. It is above all on the shoulders of the executive manager that a whole project and a whole company will rest. The manager is not a dictator : it is authoritarian, but it remains awaited at the turn for the success or failure of a project internal to the company.

Policy management, a common style

This management is one-way, we can say. Employees are not invited to make decisions that could influence the future of the company. This management style is widespread and remains very recognizable: the manager expects quite convincing results .

It’s not easy to be a directive manager: any manager can have his flaws! In directive management, the personal involvement of the manager must still have limits. The responsibility of the manager is very high , and may result in misplaced authoritarianism, which would make it his weakness.

What is a good executive manager ?

Do you have an influence on your employees? Not to mention the grip (which is sometimes the case), directive management is recognizable:

  • The manager has a natural authority;
  • He masters his business and its management;
  • He knows how to judge and gauge flaws and successes;
  • He is pro in his organization;
  • He knows exactly how to distribute employees (or rather employees)
  • It makes firm decisions;
  • A good executive manager knows how to self-criticize himself. Lack of self-criticism may be one of the weaknesses of the policy management style.

Advantages of directive management

This type of management obviously has advantages, but also disadvantages. Let’s first look at the advantages of policy management:

  • The manager ensures the smooth functioning of the company and knows what to do, even with employees without experience;
  • In the event of an emergency, everything is managed without problems;
  • This type of coaching is less stressful for new recruits: no responsibility should be foreseen at the outset;
  • Employees who appreciate this coaching can rest on it;

The disadvantages of executive management

So there are limits to this kind of management. A manager with all the weight of responsibility is easily overtaken and stressed . If his stress management is poor, it can have disastrous consequences for the team.

If employees want to participate at a time that would be necessary for the company and the manager blocks the desire for autonomy, tensions can develop .

employees who do not collaborate with their business can quickly get bored firmly in their functions. It is essential to realize these limitations before moving straight to bore-out and a cruel lack of self-esteem as an employee of a company.

Work and management: which style to choose?

Executive management is an excellent option when the manager has an enthusiasm that radiates on his employees. The team takes orders and instructions, of course, but they know they can trust the manager on their decisions.

It makes sense to opt for the directive management style, but only if a form of evaluation is put in place next to it. Thus, the manager controls the progress of tasks and the achievement of the objectives.

Other management styles exist without being more effective. Depending on the person, team, domain of activity and objectives to be achieved, a management style can be a success and another a disaster on employees and the company.

Why and when to avoid directive management

If you are looking for work and already have some autonomy, do not go to a sector that disadvantages this asset. This kind of professional experience would cut your wings off.

IF employees feel they are not listened to at all, there is a risk in the long term that they will no longer have “faith” to make efforts for the company. We must then identify profiles and propose alternatives, changes of positions, etc. A totally inefficient team due to a directive management sign the death arrest of a company: it is therefore necessary to be vigilant when at the limits offered by this type of demand.

related Posts